Registry

Diagnosis criteria

Home/ Working Parties/ Registry/ Diagnosis criteria

ESID Registry - Working definitions for clinical diagnosis of PID

Since 2011 onwards, the ESID Registry Working Party has initiated a thorough reform of the ESID Registry.

Enhancing the quality of registration in the database is one major axis of improvement. We have thus implemented a quality control process that includes validation of the diagnosis. This has been a very collaborative piece of work (thank you to all the colleagues who contributed to this, see below). 

As per June 2018, all PID diagnoses have working definitions for clinical diagnosis and registration. 

Please make sure to use them and give us any feedback, for this is an ongoing work as knowledge in the field evolves rapidly.

Nizar MAHLAOUI, June 2018.

The criteria are available in the following pdf (latest version: June, 21, 2018):

The people who contributed to these criteria are:

Mario Abinun, Michael Albert, Sarah Beaussant Cohen, Matthew Buckland, Jacinta Bustamante, Andrew Cant, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Helen Chapel, Genevieve de Saint Basile, Esther de Vries, Inderjeet Dokal, Jean Donadieu, Anne Durandy, David Edgar, Stephan Ehl, Teresa Espanol, Amos Etzioni, Alain Fischer, Bobby Gaspar, Richard Gatti, Andrew Gennery, Sofia Grigoriadou, Bodo Grimbacher, Steven Holland, Gritta Janka, Maria Kanariou, Christoph Klein, Helen Lachmann, Desa Lilic, Nizar Mahlaoui, Ania Manson, Natalia Martinez, Isabelle Meyts, Nicolette Moes, Despina Moshous, Benedicte Neven, Hans Ochs, Capucine Picard, Isabella Quinti, Ellen Renner, Frederic Rieux-Laucat, Reinhard Seger, Markus Seidel, Annarosa Soresina, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Vojtech Thon, Adrian Thrasher, Frank van de Veerdonk, Joris van Montfrans, Anna Villa, Corry Waemes, Klaus Warnatz, Beata Wolska, and Shen-Yin Zhang.